High Speed
Gating
Gating is probably the most important single advantage of the
PI·MAX camera system. It is the electronic shutter action
produced by controlling the photocathode voltage of the image
intensifier. Gating allows the detection of low light level signals
in the presence of interfering light sources of much greater energy
by temporal discrimination. For instance, in combustion research
a pulsed laser probe is used to investigate the chemistry within
a flame. Since the flame itself emits broadband light continuously,
the total flame emission is much greater than the signal resulting
from the laser probe (such as laser induced fluorescence or Raman).
Fortunately, since the laser pulse is very short and the time
at which it occurs is known, it is possible to gate for a few
nanoseconds during the laser pulse, thus reducing the flame emission
interference by a factor of 10 6 to 10 8 .Gate
times as short as 2 nsec FWHM (full width at half maximum) optical
gate times are possible Since the control is electronic, the shutter
time can be made virtually as long as desired, so shutter times
from 2 nsec up to seconds can be implemented in one instrument
setup. The electronic shutter on/off ratio is very high, typically
5 × 10 6 or greater.
MCP bracket pulsing
Another feature that contributes to the PI·MAX extraordinary
flexibility is provision for MCP bracket pulsing. Traditionally,
intensified detectors discriminated against background signal
by gating the photocathode. Although this technique yields very
high peak Off/On ratios, on the order of 5 × 10 6
to 1 in the visible, background signal can still prove troublesome
in low-duty factor measurements, particularly in the UV region
where the rejection is only ~10 4 to 1. The
PI·MAX allows bracket pulsing of the intensifier microchannel
plate (MCP), in addition to the photocathode gating, to gain higher
rejection (10 6 :1) in UV measurements. Note
that bracket pulsing does not help in the visible region. Under
extremely low duty-factor conditions, the only remedy is to install
an external shutter ahead of the camera.
Photocathode
Spectral Range
Princeton Instruments offers a selection of Gen II and Gen IV
(also called Gen III enhanced) image intensifiers, covering the
entire visible and NIR spectral region. Gen II intensifiers are
available with red enhanced, blue enhanced, and compromise red-blue
enhanced photocathodes as stock items. Quantum efficiencies above
1% are attainable from about 160 nm to about 850 nm with quartz
or suprasil windows. Intensifiers with MgF 2 windows are also
available with response in the 120-700 nm range. Gen IV intensifiers
are available in the 400 - 900 nm region, and for the 800 - 1100
nm region. Some image intensifiers suffer from "iris effect"
when gated. Iris effect is mostly a result of the distributed
resistance and capacitance of the photocathode, causing the periphery
of the photocathode to turn on before the center and vice versa
on turn off. The usual solution to iris effect problems is to
put a conductive underlay on the photocathode, but this reduces
quantum efficiency. High QE intensifiers with low iris effect
and without compromise are offered exclusively by PI. PI selects
image intensifiers for minimum noise, negligible corona, highest
gain, and longest operational and shelf life. In addition, because
of our close relationships with most of the major intensifier
manufacturers worldwide, we can usually provide state of the art
custom photocathodes. For special requirements contact our office
or your representative.
Signal Detection
vs. Signal Measurement
Probably the most confusing aspect of ICCDs is the distinction
between detection and measurement. Fiber coupled ICCDs like the
PI·MAX, have the option of operating the intensifier at
extremely high net gain, greatly intensifying the light reaching
the CCD. Thus a single photoelectron from the photocathode can
produce a signal of 80 to 100 A/D units ("counts") with
a readout noise of only 1 A/D unit, making it very easy to determine
if a photoelectron event occurred. This is detection, and ICCDs
excel at it. In many experimental applications, the importance
of detection is that it allows the experimental system to be set
up and adjusted into operation. In the beginning, the various
elements of the experiment are not optimized and the mere existence
of an optical signal is a sign the experimenter is on the right
track. Once the experiment is optimized, there is often sufficient
optical signal so that existence is no longer important, but quantization
is. As the magnitude of the signal increases, the photon shot
noise of the signal itself becomes more significant, and soon
becomes the dominant noise source in the experiment. The advantage
of a high sensitivity ICCD is not that it provides a higher S/N
ratio with a reasonably sized signal, but that it allows the experiment
to be optimized to the condition where there is enough signal
to measure. Of course, once you reach this state, you can adjust
the gain downward in the high sensitivity ICCD and get higher
dynamic range and even a slightly better S/N ratio than with a
low gain ICCD. To maximize the signal to noise ratio of the data
as the signal increases, the gain of the ICCD should be reduced,
allowing the maximum number of photons to be captured within the
dynamic range of the ICCD. Some ICCD vendors have used this as
an argument against high gain ICCDs, but it is a false argument
for three reasons:
For maximum S/N, the available signal should just fill the detector's dynamic range.
The experimental world often refuses to provide enough signal to fill the detector's dynamic range.
If you need extreme gain (detection mode) to set up and adjust the experiment, then it follows that with a "lowgain only" ICCD it will not be possible (or at least it will be much more tedious) to get the experiment optimized enough to use the low sensitivity settings.